Banking on Mike

I'm a bit late to respond, but I feel that Pipecock has made an accurate observation on the huge differences between Mad Mike Banks and Richie Hawtin, who, like it or not, are two of techno's most well-known names. Pipecock's point, that they inhabit two unrelated universes and have diametrically opposed agendas, is spot on. I posted recently on the similarities between a speaker system that cancelled out any noise leaking to outside its confines - that one of Villalobos' friends was designing - and the anarchistic notion of the 'TAZ'. In as much as what this speaker concept promises could be viewed as a political statement, Mad Mike's contribution to the wider community he lives in is much more meaningful and inclusive. The example he sets shows that those involved in music can use their status/money/reputation to help those in need of guidance or direction. It proves that techno does not have to be all about the self or following the fleeting hedonistic trail, no matter how much fun that may be in the short term. Banks' work with the disdadvantged in his area is also proof that techno has the potential to be a powerful political weapon - especially if you accept as I do that all politics is local. It certainly seems to have stoked up a healthy discussion on Infinitestatemachine - the comments section is also worth reading if you have the time.